Congressional
Accountability Project
1611 Connecticut Ave. NW Suite #3A
Washington, DC 20009
Phone (202) 296-2787 * Fax (202) 833-2406
cap@essential.org * www.essential.org/orgs/CAP/CAP.html
December 6, 2000
Lee J. Radek
Chief
Public Integrity Section
Criminal Division
U.S. Department of Justice
Tenth Street and Constitution Ave., NW
Washington, DC 50530
RE: Request for Investigation of
Rep. James Moran and Terry Lierman
Dear Mr. Radek:
This letter constitutes a formal
request to the Justice Department to investigate whether:
1. Representative James P. Moran
(D-VA) violated federal statutes prohibiting the receipt of
illegal gratuities, or solicitation of things of value from
favor-seekers, by accepting and/or soliciting a $25,000
unsecured loan, with generous terms, from a registered lobbyist,
Terry Lierman.
2. Terry Lierman violated the
federal illegal gratuities statute by providing a $25,000 loan
to Moran.
On October 31, 2000, The Washington
Post reported that Rep. James Moran had received a $25,000
unsecured, low-cost, open-ended loan ("Lierman loan") from Terry
Lierman, who, at that time was a registered lobbyist and President
of Capitol Associates Inc., a lobbying firm.
The stakes were high.
Schering-Plough Corp. had assembled a lobbying team to
persuade Congress to help preserve its monopoly on the
popular allergy drug Claritin. Furious watchdog groups
argued that extending the pharmaceutical giant's patent
would cost consumers billions of dollars by delaying access
to cheaper generic drugs.
The drug company found an ally
in Rep. James P. Moran Jr. (D-Va.).
On June 30, 1999, Moran signed
up to co-sponsor a bill to help Schering-Plough. On July 23,
1999, Moran sent a letter to other New Democrats, seeking
their support. About the same time that summer, Moran
received some much-needed financial help: an unsecured $
25,000 loan from Terry Lierman, a lobbyist for
Schering-Plough.(1)
According to the Post, the terms of the Lierman loan were
generous to Moran, apparently far better than what was available in
the commercial loan market through an arm's length transaction.
Yesterday, Lierman faxed to The
Washington Post a copy of a one-paragraph promissory note
dated June 25, 1999, that said Moran borrowed $ 25,000, with
the option to borrow more at the same 8 percent annual
interest rate. The promissory note was never publicly
recorded, Lierman said.
Bankers, speaking without
knowledge of the people involved, described the loan as
unusual because it lacks a maturity date and has no
provision for repayment of the principal other than to say
that Lierman may call in the loan at any time.
"It would be very unlikely that
you get those terms at a bank," said Keith Leggett, a senior
economist at the American Bankers Association.
It also might have been
difficult for Moran to go to a bank, something he said he
didn't even consider. The promissory note is dated five days
before Moran signed on to the Claritin bill and one day
after Moran's wife filed for divorce.
* * * * *
The terms outlined in the
promissory note require that Moran pay 8 percent in interest
annually. The payments must be made no less than
semiannually.
In June 1999, when Lierman lent
Moran the money, the minimum rate for an unsecured personal
loan in the Washington area was 12.5 percent, according to
Bank Rate Inc., a company that tracks rates.
"With an unsecured loan and no
collateral, [banks] really are going to look at your credit
rating" to set the rate, said the company's John Schaffer.
One possible reason that Lierman might charge Moran a lower
rate is that the loan may be called in at any time, said
Leggett, the bankers association economist.(2)
A: Request for Investigation
of Whether Moran and/or Lierman Violated Federal Law
Prohibiting the Offering, Solicitation and Receipt of
Illegal Gratuities
The Washington Post reported that
"The promissory note [for the Lierman loan] is dated five days
before Moran signed on to the Claritin bill."(3)
The closeness in time between the Lierman loan and Moran's official
acts in support of Lierman's client Schering-Plough(4)
raises questions about whether Moran and Lierman may have violated
criminal prohibitions against the offering, solicitation and receipt
of illegal gratuities. The Justice Department should determine
whether Moran and Lierman violated the federal illegal gratuities
statute, which prohibits government employees from directly or
indirectly seeking or receiving personally anything of value other
than "as provided by law...for or because of any official act
performed or to be performed"(5)
and prohibits anyone from directly or indirectly providing anything
of value to government employees "otherwise than as provided by
law...for or because of any official act performed or to be
performed."(6)
As a part of this investigation, the
Justice Department should determine whether Moran performed
legislative favors for any of Lierman's other clients near the time
of the Lierman loan. The Washington Post reported extensively
on Moran's legislative assistance to Lierman's lobbying client
Schering-Plough. In addition, during 1999, many of Lierman's other
lobbying clients had legislative business before the committees on
which Moran sits. The Justice Department should investigate if, how,
and when Moran aided Lierman's other lobbying clients too. In
addition, the Justice Department should evaluate whether it is true,
as Moran claims, that "Terry [Lierman] really never lobbied me on
anything."(7)
Such an investigation would help illuminate the context of the
Lierman loan, and whether the Lierman loan was an illegal gratuity.
Lierman explained to the
Post that "the essence of what we do" at his lobbying firm, is
to "lobby to increase funding for various health-related programs."(8)
Such lobbying overlaps well with Moran's committee assignments. When
Moran received the Lierman loan, he was a Member of the House
Committee on Appropriations and the Committee on the Budget.
According to Lierman's lobbying reports, during 1999, Lierman
lobbied on behalf of 31 clients with matters pending before those
committees, including:
Academic Health Center Coalition
Albert Einstein Medical Center
American Association for Cancer Research
Bermuda Biological Station for Research
The Bushnell
Cell Therapeutics, Inc.
College on Problems of Drug Dependence, Inc.
Concert Productions Inc.
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
FDA-NIH Council
Foundation for Fighting Blindness
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Health Physics Society
Joint Council of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology
Kennedy Krieger Institute
Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research
Lymphoma Research Foundation of America, Inc.
NCCR
National Nutritional Foods Association
National Association of Community Health Centers
New York University Medical Center
Northwest Regional Education Laboratory
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Parkinson's Action Network
Pennsylvania Convention Center Authority
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
Research Society on Alcoholism
The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International
Sea Solar Power, Inc.
Spina Bifida Association of America Foundation
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center(9)
Rep. Moran is Ranking Minority Member
of the House Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on the District
of Columbia. In 1999, according to Lierman's lobbying reports,
Lierman lobbied on behalf of 19 clients with issues related to or
incorporated into legislation making appropriations for the District
of Columbia, including:
Academic Health Center Coalition
Albert Einstein Medical Center
Cell Therapeutics, Inc.
College on Problems of Drug Dependence, Inc.
Concert Productions Inc.
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
FDA-NIH Council
Foundation for Fighting Blindness
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Joint Council of Asthma, Allergy and Immunology
Lustgarten Foundation for Pancreatic Cancer Research
National Association of Community Health Centers
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory
National Nutritional Foods Association
Parkinson's Action Network
Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency
Research Society on Alcoholism
The Rotary Foundation of Rotary International
Spina Bifida Association of America Foundation
Lierman's lobbying firm, Capitol
Associates Inc., boasts of its ability to influence the
congressional appropriations and budget processes. In promotional
materials, Capitol Associates says that it "gets results for our
clients....Many of our clients have goals and objectives that
involve securing federal funding for various projects and
initiatives. We have a long record of success in this area..."(10)
The Justice Department should determine to what extent Lierman's
lobbying of Moran, in 1999, reflects or is responsible for this
"long record of success.
B: Request for Investigation
of Whether Moran Violated a Statutory Prohibition Against
Soliciting Things of Value from Favor-Seekers
The Justice Department should determine
whether Moran violated federal law prohibiting federal employees
from soliciting anything of value from favor-seekers or those who
might be significantly affected by the employee's official acts.
(a) Except as permitted by
subsection (b), no Member of Congress or officer or employee
of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch shall
solicit or accept anything of value from a person-
(1) seeking official action
from, doing business with, or (in the case of executive
branch officers and employees) conducting activities
regulated by, the individual's employing entity; or
(2) whose interests may be
substantially affected by the performance or nonperformance
of the individual's official duties.(11)
The Justice Department should probe who
solicited the Lierman loan, as well as when, how, and in what
context it was solicited. The Washington Post reported that
Moran couldn't remember who solicited the Lierman loan.
Moran said he couldn't recall if
he had "directly called Terry. It may have been through . .
. my campaign manager."(12)
One day later, the Post reported
that Moran's campaign chairman, Mame Reiley, claimed that she -- not
Moran -- solicited the loan from Lierman.
Mame Reiley, Moran's former
chief of staff and his current campaign chairman, said it
was she, not Moran, who first approached Lierman for the
loan after she became aware that Moran badly needed money to
pay a lawyer to represent him in a contentious divorce.
"I did so on my own, without Jim
requesting it, because I didn't want to put Terry in an
uncomfortable position" if he could not lend his friend the
money, Reiley said. She said she went to Lierman because he
was Moran's "closest friend."(13)
Even if Reiley initially solicited the
Lierman loan, Moran may still have violated the prohibition against
solicitation, because eventually Moran did know of and was therefore
complicit in the solicitation.
The Justice Department should thoroughly
investigate the terms of the Lierman loan, the circumstances
surrounding the solicitation of the loan, and any official acts that
Moran may have taken to aid Lierman's lobbying clients, to determine
whether Moran and Lierman violated federal law in offering,
soliciting or accepting the Lierman loan.
Sincerely,
Gary Ruskin
Director
ENDNOTES
1. Jo Becker, "Moran Got Loan From
Drug Lobbyist; Va. Congressman Co-Sponsored Bill to Help
Pharmaceutical Firm." The Washington Post, October 31, 2000.
Attachment #1 also includes Jo Becker, "Lierman Plays Down Lobbying;
Morella Challenger's Activities Included Representing Drug
Companies." The Washington Post, November 1, 2000. "Rep.
Moran's Loan Deal." The Washington Post, November 1, 2000. Jo
Becker, "Moran Says He'll Repay Lobbyist Immediately; Congressman to
Return Drug Firm Donations." The Washington Post, November 2,
2000. "Probe Moran." Roll Call, November 6, 2000.
2. Jo Becker, "Moran Got Loan From
Drug Lobbyist; Va. Congressman Co-Sponsored Bill to Help
Pharmaceutical Firm." The Washington Post, October 31, 2000.
3. Jo Becker, "Moran Got Loan From
Drug Lobbyist; Va. Congressman Co-Sponsored Bill to Help
Pharmaceutical Firm." The Washington Post, October 31, 2000.
4. See Attachment #2.
5. 18 U.S.C. §201(c)(1)(B).
6. 18 U.S.C. §201(c)(1)(A).
7. Jo Becker, "Moran Got Loan From
Drug Lobbyist; Va. Congressman Co-Sponsored Bill to Help
Pharmaceutical Firm." The Washington Post, October 31, 2000.
8. Jo Becker, "Lierman Plays Down
Lobbying; Morella Challenger's Activities Included Representing Drug
Companies." The Washington Post, November 1, 2000.
9. See Attachment #3.
10. Capitol Associates website
<http://207.127.113.12/home.asp?Page=Accomplishments>. See
Attachment #4.
11. 5 U.S.C. § 7353.
12. Jo Becker, "Moran Got Loan From
Drug Lobbyist; Va. Congressman Co-Sponsored Bill to Help
Pharmaceutical Firm." The Washington Post, October 31, 2000.
13. Jo Becker and William Branigin,
"Complaint Filed Over Loan From Lobbyist; Moran Got Cash From
Friend."The Washington Post, November 1, 2000. See Attachment
#5.
|